Skip to main content
Advertisement
  • Other Publications
    • EMBO Press
    • Molecular Systems Biology (Home)
    • The EMBO Journal
    • EMBO reports
    • EMBO Molecular Medicine
Login

   

Search

Advanced Search

Journal

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Archive
  • Subject Collections
  • Review Series & Focuses
  • Podcasts & Videos

Authors & Referees

  • Submit
  • Author Guidelines
  • Aims & Scope
  • Editors & Board
  • Transparent Process
  • Bibliometrics
  • Open Access
  • Referee Guidelines

Info

  • E-Mail Editorial Office
  • Alerts
  • RSS Feeds
  • Reprints & Permissions
  • Advertise & Sponsor
  • Media Partners
  • News & Press
  • Customer Service
  • About
  • Archive
  • Author Guidelines
  • Submit
  • E-alert

Advanced Search

  • Deep learning for computational biology

    Christof Angermueller, Oliver Stegle and colleagues

    Deep learning, a class of modern machine learning methods, has become a go‐to approach for analysing large‐scale high‐dimensional data. This review discusses its applications in biology, focusing on regulatory genomics and cellular imaging, and gives guidelines for practitioners.

  • Transcriptomics resources of human tissues and organs

    Mathias Uhlén, Jens Nielsen and colleagues

    Quantifying gene expression in human organs, tissues and cell types is vital to understand physiology and disease. The Review discusses publically available human transcriptome resources and their applications in combination with genome‐scale metabolic models.

  • Latest Online
  • Most Read
Loading
  • Article
    Negative frequency‐dependent interactions can underlie phenotypic heterogeneity in a clonal microbial population
    Negative frequency‐dependent interactions can underlie phenotypic heterogeneity in a clonal microbial population
    1. David Healey1,
    2. Kevin Axelrod2 and
    3. Jeff Gore*,3
    1. 1Department of Biology, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, USA
    2. 2Graduate Program in Biophysics, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA, USA
    3. 3Department of Physics, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, USA
    1. ↵*Corresponding author. Tel: +1 6172534829; E‐mail: gore{at}mit.edu

    Analyses of the yeast GAL network show that phenotypic heterogeneity can result from negative frequency‐dependent interactions favoring rare phenotypes over common ones and indicate that a stochastic “mixed strategy” of GAL activation is evolutionarily favorable.

    Synopsis

    Analyses of the yeast GAL network show that phenotypic heterogeneity can result from negative frequency‐dependent interactions favoring rare phenotypes over common ones and indicate that a stochastic “mixed strategy” of GAL activation is evolutionarily favorable.

    • In an environment of finite mixed glucose and galactose, yeast strains that are “always ON” or “always OFF” with respect to the GAL network can each invade the other when rare, and there exists an evolutionarily stable mix of the two.

    • A yeast strain that stochastically activates or deactivates the GAL network in this environment is evolutionarily favored against both pure strategist strains.

    • A stochastic GAL‐ON/OFF “mixed strategy” can consistently evolve de novo from a pure strategist strain by exposure to mixed glucose and galactose environments over many generations.

    • Therefore, in addition to the more common explanation of environmental bet hedging, frequency‐dependent selection may also drive phenotypic heterogeneity in clonal microbial populations.

    • ecology
    • evolution
    • frequency dependence
    • phenotypic heterogeneity
    • stochastic gene expression

    Mol Syst Biol. (2016) 12: 877

    • Received April 25, 2016.
    • Revision received June 28, 2016.
    • Accepted July 4, 2016.
    • © 2016 The Authors. Published under the terms of the CC BY 4.0 license

    This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

    David Healey, Kevin Axelrod, Jeff Gore
    Published online 03.08.2016
    • Evolution
    • Microbiology, Virology & Host Pathogen Interaction
    • Quantitative Biology & Dynamical Systems
  • News & Views
    Frequency‐dependent selection: a diversifying force in microbial populations
    Frequency‐dependent selection: a diversifying force in microbial populations
    1. Daniel A Charlebois1 and
    2. Gábor Balázsi (gabor.balazsi{at}stonybrook.edu)1
    1. 1The Louis and Beatrice Laufer Center for Physical & Quantitative Biology and Department of Biomedical Engineering, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, NY, USA

    The benefits of “bet‐hedging” strategies have been assumed to be the main cause of phenotypic diversity in biological populations. However, in their recent work, Healey et al (2016) provide experimental support for negative frequency‐dependent selection (NFDS) as an alternative driving force of diversity. NFDS favors rare phenotypes over common ones, resulting in an evolutionarily stable mixture of phenotypes that is not necessarily optimal for population growth.

    See also: D Healey et al (August 2016)

    The benefits of “bet‐hedging” strategies have been assumed to be the main cause of phenotypic population diversity. However, Healey et al (2016) provide experimental support for negative frequency‐dependent selection as an alternative driving force of diversity.

    Mol Syst Biol. (2016) 12: 880

    • © 2016 The Authors. Published under the terms of the CC BY 4.0 license

    This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

    Daniel A Charlebois, Gábor Balázsi
    Published online 03.08.2016
    • Evolution
    • Microbiology, Virology & Host Pathogen Interaction
    • Quantitative Biology & Dynamical Systems
  • Report
    Parallel reverse genetic screening in mutant human cells using transcriptomics
    Parallel reverse genetic screening in mutant human cells using transcriptomics
    1. Bianca V Gapp1,†,
    2. Tomasz Konopka1,†,
    3. Thomas Penz2,
    4. Vineet Dalal1,
    5. Tilmann Bürckstümmer3,
    6. Christoph Bock2,4,5 and
    7. Sebastian MB Nijman*,1,2,6
    1. 1Nuffield Department of Clinical Medicine, Ludwig Cancer Research Ltd. University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
    2. 2CeMM Research Center for Molecular Medicine of the Austrian Academy of Sciences, Vienna, Austria
    3. 3Horizon Genomics, Vienna, Austria
    4. 4Department of Laboratory Medicine, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
    5. 5Max Planck Institute for Informatics, Saarbrücken, Germany
    6. 6Nuffield Department of Clinical Medicine, Target Discovery Institute University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
    1. ↵*Corresponding author. Tel: +44 1865 612885; E‐mail: Sebastian.nijman{at}ludwig.ox.ac.uk
    1. ↵† These authors contributed equally to this work

    Genome editing and transcriptomic profiling enable reverse genetic exploration of gene function in human cells. Ten parallel screens of tyrosine kinase knock‐out cells reveal quantitative and qualitative changes in signaling upon genetic perturbations.

    Synopsis

    Genome editing and transcriptomic profiling enable reverse genetic exploration of gene function in human cells. Ten parallel screens of tyrosine kinase knock‐out cells reveal quantitative and qualitative changes in signaling upon genetic perturbations.

    • A collection of isogenic kinase knock‐out cell lines are generated by genome editing using CRISPR/Cas9.

    • Shallow and highly multiplexed RNA sequencing provides a robust and scalable assay for phenotyping hundreds of samples that is suitable for screening.

    • The responses of mutant cell lines to diverse external perturbations reveal varying degrees of signaling changes, linking genes to pathways.

    • kinases
    • multiplexed RNA sequencing
    • parallel screening
    • reverse genetics
    • systematic phenotyping

    Mol Syst Biol. (2016) 12: 879

    • Received February 16, 2016.
    • Revision received July 6, 2016.
    • Accepted July 7, 2016.
    • © 2016 The Authors. Published under the terms of the CC BY 4.0 license

    This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

    Bianca V Gapp, Tomasz Konopka, Thomas Penz, Vineet Dalal, Tilmann Bürckstümmer, Christoph Bock, Sebastian MB Nijman
    Published online 01.08.2016
    • Chromatin, Epigenetics, Genomics & Functional Genomics
    • Methods & Resources
  • Review
    Deep learning for computational biology
    Deep learning for computational biology
    1. Christof Angermueller1,†,
    2. Tanel Pärnamaa2,3,†,
    3. Leopold Parts*,2,3 and
    4. Oliver Stegle*,1
    1. 1European Molecular Biology Laboratory, European Bioinformatics Institute, Wellcome Trust Genome Campus, Hinxton Cambridge, UK
    2. 2Department of Computer Science, University of Tartu, Tartu, Estonia
    3. 3Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute, Wellcome Trust Genome Campus, Hinxton Cambridge, UK
    1. ↵* Corresponding author. Tel: +44 1223 834 244; E‐mail: leopold.parts{at}sanger.ac.uk
      Corresponding author. Tel: +44 1223 494 101; E‐mail: oliver.stegle{at}ebi.ac.uk
    1. ↵† These authors contributed equally to this work

    Deep learning, a class of modern machine learning methods, has become a go‐to approach for analysing large‐scale high‐dimensional data. This review discusses its applications in biology, focusing on regulatory genomics and cellular imaging, and gives guidelines for practitioners.

    • cellular imaging
    • computational biology
    • deep learning
    • machine learning
    • regulatory genomics

    Mol Syst Biol. (2016) 12: 878

    • Received April 11, 2016.
    • Revision received June 2, 2016.
    • Accepted June 6, 2016.
    • © 2016 The Authors. Published under the terms of the CC BY 4.0 license

    This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

    Christof Angermueller, Tanel Pärnamaa, Leopold Parts, Oliver Stegle
    Published online 29.07.2016
    • Computational Biology
  • Article
    Co‐recruitment analysis of the CBL and CBLB signalosomes in primary T cells identifies CD5 as a key regulator of TCR‐induced ubiquitylation
    Co‐recruitment analysis of the CBL and CBLB signalosomes in primary T cells identifies CD5 as a key regulator of TCR‐induced ubiquitylation
    1. Guillaume Voisinne1,†,
    2. Antonio García‐Blesa1,†,
    3. Karima Chaoui2,
    4. Frédéric Fiore3,
    5. Elise Bergot1,
    6. Laura Girard1,3,
    7. Marie Malissen1,3,
    8. Odile Burlet‐Schiltz2,
    9. Anne Gonzalez de Peredo2,
    10. Bernard Malissen*,1,3 and
    11. Romain Roncagalli*,1
    1. 1Centre d'Immunologie de Marseille‐Luminy, Aix Marseille Université, Inserm, CNRS, Marseille, France
    2. 2Institut de Pharmacologie et de Biologie Structurale, Département Biologie Structural Biophysique, Protéomique Génopole Toulouse Midi Pyrénées, CNRS UMR 5089, Toulouse Cedex, France
    3. 3Centre d'Immunophénomique, Aix Marseille Université UM2, Inserm US012, CNRS UMS3367, Marseille, France
    1. ↵* Corresponding author. Tel: +33 491269478; Fax: +33 491269430; E‐mail: bernardm{at}ciml.univ-mrs.fr
      Corresponding author. Tel: +33 491269478; Fax: +33 491269430; E‐mail: roncagalli{at}ciml.univ-mrs.fr
    1. ↵† These authors contributed equally to this work

    The composition and dynamics of the signalosomes operated by the E3 ubiquitin–protein ligases CBL and CBLB were determined in primary T cells after TCR stimulation. Analysis of correlations in protein association as a function of time reveals the importance of the CD5 transmembrane receptor in the regulation of ubiquitylation.

    Synopsis

    The composition and dynamics of the signalosomes operated by the E3 ubiquitin–protein ligases CBL and CBLB were determined in primary T cells after TCR stimulation. Analysis of correlations in protein association as a function of time reveals the importance of the CD5 transmembrane receptor in the regulation of ubiquitylation.

    • The signalosomes of the E3‐ubiquitin ligases CBL and CBLB exhibit both redundant and distinct features in mature CD4+ T cells.

    • Analysis of correlations in protein association with CBL and CBLB accurately predicts interactions between recruited proteins.

    • CD5 is identified as a key regulator of CBL‐ and CBLB‐mediated ubiquitylation following TCR engagement.

    • CBL
    • CBLB
    • CD5
    • ubiquitylation

    Mol Syst Biol. (2016) 12: 876

    • Received January 26, 2016.
    • Revision received June 14, 2016.
    • Accepted June 23, 2016.
    • © 2016 The Authors. Published under the terms of the CC BY 4.0 license

    This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

    Guillaume Voisinne, Antonio García‐Blesa, Karima Chaoui, Frédéric Fiore, Elise Bergot, Laura Girard, Marie Malissen, Odile Burlet‐Schiltz, Anne Gonzalez de Peredo, Bernard Malissen, Romain Roncagalli
    Published online 29.07.2016
    • Immunology
    • Post-translational Modifications, Proteolysis & Proteomics
    • Signal Transduction
  • Article
    Pervasive isoform‐specific translational regulation via alternative transcription start sites in mammals
    Pervasive isoform‐specific translational regulation via alternative transcription start sites in mammals
    1. Xi Wang1,†,
    2. Jingyi Hou1,†,
    3. Claudia Quedenau1 and
    4. Wei Chen*,1,2
    1. 1Laboratory for Functional Genomics and Systems Biology, Berlin Institute for Medical Systems Biology, Max‐Delbrück‐Centrum für Molekulare Medizin, Berlin, Germany
    2. 2Department of Biology, South University of Science and Technology of China, Shenzhen, Guangdong, China
    1. ↵*Corresponding author. Tel: +86 75588018449; E‐mails: wei.chen{at}mdc-berlin.de; chenw{at}sustc.edu.cn
    1. ↵† These authors contributed equally to this work

    Polysome profiling combined with 5ʹ‐end sequencing in mouse fibroblasts shows pervasive isoform‐specific translational regulation via alternative transcription start sites (TSSs) and reveals 5′UTR sequence features linked to translational regulation.

    Synopsis

    Polysome profiling combined with 5ʹ‐end sequencing in mouse fibroblasts shows pervasive isoform‐specific translational regulation via alternative transcription start sites (TSSs) and reveals 5′UTR sequence features linked to translational regulation.

    • Isoform‐specific translational regulation is achieved through alternative TSS usage.

    • Isoforms with longer 5ʹUTRs tend to have lower translational efficiency (TE).

    • Systematic analyses of isoform‐specific translation offer new insights into the regulation by known sequence features and identifies novel regulatory sequence motifs.

    • Quantitative models integrating all identified sequence features explain over half of the variance in the observed TE divergence between isoforms.

    • alternative transcription start sites
    • cis‐regulatory elements
    • isoform‐divergent translation
    • translational regulation

    Mol Syst Biol. (2016) 12: 875

    • Received March 10, 2016.
    • Revision received June 17, 2016.
    • Accepted June 21, 2016.
    • © 2016 The Authors. Published under the terms of the CC BY 4.0 license

    This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

    Xi Wang, Jingyi Hou, Claudia Quedenau, Wei Chen
    Published online 18.07.2016
    • Chromatin, Epigenetics, Genomics & Functional Genomics
    • Genome-Scale & Integrative Biology
    • Protein Biosynthesis & Quality Control
  • Article
    Strand‐specific, high‐resolution mapping of modified RNA polymerase II
    Strand‐specific, high‐resolution mapping of modified RNA polymerase II
    1. Laura Milligan1,
    2. Vân A Huynh‐Thu2,3,
    3. Clémentine Delan‐Forino1,
    4. Alex Tuck1,4,5,
    5. Elisabeth Petfalski1,
    6. Rodrigo Lombraña6,
    7. Guido Sanguinetti*,2,
    8. Grzegorz Kudla*,6 and
    9. David Tollervey*,1
    1. 1Wellcome Trust Centre for Cell Biology, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
    2. 2School of Informatics, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
    3. 3Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, University of Liège, Liège, Belgium
    4. 4Friedrich Miescher Institute for Biomedical Research, Basel, Switzerland
    5. 5European Molecular Biology Laboratory, European Bioinformatics Institute (EMBL‐EBI) Wellcome Trust Genome Campus, Cambridge, UK
    6. 6MRC Human Genetics Unit, IGMM, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
    1. ↵* Corresponding author. Tel: +44 131 650 7092; E‐mail: d.tollervey{at}ed.ac.uk
      Corresponding author. Tel: +44 131 651 8628; E‐mail: gkudla{at}gmail.com
      Corresponding author. Tel: +44 131 650 5136; E‐mail: gsanguin{at}inf.ed.ac.uk

    A new technique for transcriptome‐wide mapping of RNAPII carrying the five types of CTD phosphorylation is presented. Distinct modification states associated with initiating, early and late elongating RNAPII are identified using a hidden Markov model.

    Synopsis

    A new technique for transcriptome‐wide mapping of RNAPII carrying the five types of CTD phosphorylation is presented. Distinct modification states associated with initiating, early and late elongating RNAPII are identified using a hidden Markov model.

    • Multiple modified forms of RNAPII can be mapped with nucleotide resolution.

    • Machine learning can be used to extract biological insights from these datasets.

    • Initiating RNAPII is associated with a distinct, surveillance‐prone state.

    • Unstable ncRNAs fail to exit this state, potentially linked to rapid degradation.

    • hidden Markov model
    • polymerase CTD phosphorylation
    • transcription
    • yeast

    Mol Syst Biol. (2016) 12: 874

    • Received February 8, 2016.
    • Revision received May 13, 2016.
    • Accepted May 18, 2016.
    • © 2016 The Authors. Published under the terms of the CC BY 4.0 license

    This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

    Laura Milligan, Vân A Huynh‐Thu, Clémentine Delan‐Forino, Alex Tuck, Elisabeth Petfalski, Rodrigo Lombraña, Guido Sanguinetti, Grzegorz Kudla, David Tollervey
    Published online 10.06.2016
    • Chromatin, Epigenetics, Genomics & Functional Genomics
    • Methods & Resources
    • Transcription
All recent articles
Back to top

June 2016 Cover

Genomics, Systems Genetics & Functional Genomics

Highlights of research recently published in Molecular Systems Biology:

  • Allelic expression mapping across cellular lineages
  • Genome annotation by bidirectional HMMs
  • Defining a Minimal Genome
  • Natural network involved in autism
  • Heritability of human plasma proteins
  • Negative feedback buffers regulatory variants
  • Genetic variation impacting antisense transcription
  • Bar-ChIP for high-throughput chromatin profiling

Follow @MolSystBiol


Meet the Editors

Editor conference calendar

Subject areas

  • Autophagy & Cell Death (15)
  • Cancer (9)
  • Cell Adhesion, Polarity & Cytoskeleton (9)
  • Cell Cycle (29)
  • Chemical Biology (1)
  • Chromatin, Epigenetics, Genomics & Functional Genomics (180)
  • Computational Biology (216)
  • Development & Differentiation (40)
  • DNA Replication, Repair & Recombination (10)
  • Evolution (7)
  • Genetics, Gene Therapy & Genetic Disease (2)
  • Genome-Scale & Integrative Biology (62)
  • Immunology (17)
  • Membrane & Intracellular Transport (17)
  • Metabolism (61)
  • Methods & Resources (30)
  • Microbiology, Virology & Host Pathogen Interaction (57)
  • Molecular Biology of Disease (46)
  • Network Biology (168)
  • Neuroscience (15)
  • Pharmacology & Drug Discovery (5)
  • Plant Biology (32)
  • Post-translational Modifications, Proteolysis & Proteomics (85)
  • Protein Biosynthesis & Quality Control (29)
  • Quantitative Biology & Dynamical Systems (44)
  • RNA Biology (41)
  • Signal Transduction (84)
  • Stem Cells (3)
  • Structural Biology (12)
  • Synthetic Biology & Biotechnology (59)
  • Systems Medicine (4)
  • Transcription (17)
Advertisement

Journal

  • Home
  • Latest Content
  • Archive
  • Bibliometrics
  • E-Mail Editorial Office

Authors & References

  • Aims & Scope
  • Editors & Board
  • Transparent Process
  • Author Guidelines
  • Referee Guidelines
  • Open Access
  • Submit

Info

  • Alerts
  • RSS Feeds
  • Reprints & Permissions
  • Advertise & Sponsor
  • News & Press
  • Customer Service

EMBO

  • Funding & Awards
  • Events
  • Science Policy
  • Members
  • About EMBO

Online ISSN  1744-4292

Copyright© 2016 EMBO

This website is best viewed using the latest versions of all modern web browsers. Older browsers may not display correctly.